Section 01 · Capability
The full statement: four sector divisions at depth, four delivery methods in plain English, and the questions procurement teams ask us most, answered the way we answer them in the room.
ENVELOPE 62% CLOSEDDIV 01
Office, mixed-use and workplace buildings for developers and owner-occupiers. Structure, envelope and services coordinated under one programme, from demolition to practical completion.
Recent commercial work runs from owner-occupied headquarters to speculative office over retail podiums. Where the programme benefits, we let envelope trades as separate early packages, and we say so at tender rather than at variation.
$8M to $80M · New build & redevelopment
142 UNITS · SETTLEDDIV 02
Apartment buildings from mid-rise infill to 200-unit precincts. Waterproofing, fire compliance and acoustic separation treated as structure, not finishing trades.
Multi-residential is where builders are audited hardest, so the systems are heaviest here: benchmark units signed before rollout, wet areas inspected at three hold points, and a defects period that we staff rather than survive.
$10M to $80M · 40 to 220 units
GRID 8.4 M · TYP.DIV 03
Warehouses, plants and logistics facilities where the programme is measured in tenant lease dates. Precast, tilt-up and long-span steel, with site management self-performed.
Industrial clients buy dates. Our precast and steel partners are engaged before the design is frozen, which is why our last four facilities settled on or before their lease commencement dates.
$5M to $45M · Design & construct preferred
LIVE BUILDING · AFTER HOURSDIV 04
Commercial interiors delivered inside live buildings, after hours where the asset demands it. Clean sites, sequenced deliveries, no surprises for the tenants above.
Fit-out is delivered by a dedicated crew that never rotates onto structure work. Building managers get a named contact, an after-hours matrix and a site that photographs clean every Friday.
$1M to $15M · Occupied-building specialists
Contract forms
Most disputes begin as a delivery method chosen for the wrong reasons. Here is what each one actually means, and when we would recommend it against our own interest.
You hand us a brief or a partly developed design; we take single-point responsibility for completing the design and building it for an agreed sum. Fastest to site, cleanest accountability, and the right choice when certainty of price matters more than design control.
Best fit
Developers with a settled brief and a financier watching the programme.
We manage trade contracts on your behalf for a fee, with every invoice open book. You keep control of design and scope; you also keep the cost risk. Powerful for complex or evolving projects, wrong for a fixed budget.
Best fit
Public bodies and owners with evolving scope and strong internal governance.
A complete design, priced competitively, built for a fixed contract sum. The traditional route. It rewards a finished design and punishes an unfinished one, because every gap becomes a variation with your name on it.
Best fit
Owners with completed documentation and a tested budget.
We join the design team before there is a contract, pricing the design as it develops and flagging buildability while changes are still free. It ends in a lump sum or D&C contract, with the surprises already spent.
Best fit
Complex sites, live environments, or any project where the estimate keeps moving.
Our band is $1M to $80M depending on division. Below that we are not competitive; above it we would be bluffing about capacity, and we do not tender jobs we cannot staff with named people.
Yes. Contract works, public liability at $20M, professional indemnity for design and construct, and security by bank guarantee or bond to suit the contract. Certificates of currency come with the tender, not after it.
A named project manager and a named site manager, both introduced at the tender interview, neither swapped after award without your written agreement. Their last three projects are listed in our submission.
Priced from the same rates that built the tender, submitted with the substantiation attached, and never used as a recovery strategy. Our repeat-client rate is the audit of that claim.
We prefer it. Your quantity surveyor is welcome on our sites and in our workings, and our programme sits in a live share that your team can open any week of the job.
The capability statement is one click away, and the tender desk answers inside two business days.